Thursday, June 01, 2006
What Women Bodybuilders Can Learn From Paris Hilton
(Paris Hilton on the Ellen DeGeneres Show)
Female bodybuilders have the most to gain from this method as they represent a sport where their success is based on what people see when they look at them. Some bodybuilders gain money from this process -- all wish to earn money from it. Where female bodybuilders can gain is by creating advanced buzz for who they are. Now what do I mean? I'm stating that -- and this is a theory as it's not common practice by far -- a female bodybuilder can actually impact what the judge or judges in a bodybuilding contest think of their "look" by becoming so popular that by the time they reach a contest, the judges would believe that the most well-known of the contestants should be the winner.
My evidence that this approach can work is based on the recent decisions of food-and-supplements-seller GNC and the International Federation of BodyBuilding (IFBB) to reduce the support of female bodybuilders and limit the "amount" of muscle they can build. The charges have been that people don't like "overly muscular" women. But this claim is countered by the huge number of websites featuring female bodybuilders and fitness models. My cursory count is that there are about 400 websites and thousands of photos online. Indeed, a look at Yahoo! Groups reveals several groups about women bodybuilders that serve over 10,000 members, each. These are some of the largest groups in the Yahoo! system.
While some may argue that the Yahoo! example points to the "oversexualization" of the sport of female bodybuilding, one can offer the counter-example of Women's Tennis star Anna Kornikova, who's profile increased substantially when sports talent agency Octagon marketed her sex appeal, with everything from a website with her most "interesting" photos to calendars and clothes. And then there are the websites that feature any number of near-X rated photos of the tennis stat. With Anna's celebrity, It definitely wasn't the tennis. Just as with Paris Hilton's celebrity, which had nothing to do with any industrial skill she might have. ...click for the full article
Korean Female Bodybuilders Site
This is a website presenting female bodybuilders in Korea, and if anything shows just how popular women's bodybuilding is becoming around the World. To see it, click on the title of this post.
Claire Rohrbacker-OConnel The California Champion - GeneX Forums
Dublin, CA-based Claire Rohrbacker-OConnell has taken California by storm, winning both the Cal and Contra Costa championships. Read more about the winners of the fitness contests for both events at GeneX Forums, by clicking on the title to this post. Her website's at http://www.clairerohrbacker-oconnell.com
Monday, May 29, 2006
Gina Alottia Does Cable Curls - Shows The Proper Form
In this video, female fitmodel Gina Alottia shows the proper form for cable curls.
Friday, May 26, 2006
New Userplane Webchat Social Networking System Installed; Just Look Below This Post, and Sign Up!
This blog has a new place where you can chat with others and even look at a webcam, or use your own. You can meet others into fitness here. We ask that you keep it clean. Thanks!
Thursday, May 25, 2006
Amanda Dunbar, 2005 USA Night Show Routine
This is IFBB Professional Bodybuilder Amanda Dunbar in a video that shows her night routine at the USA - Las Vegas contest.
Monday, May 22, 2006
NPC's "Anti - Internet" Rule Hurts Sponsorship Value
The National Physique Committee (NPC) is a private organization that hosts national bodybuilding events.
A little known rule established by the NPC reads:
"As you are aware, the NPC has had a standing press pass policy for all national events that only authorized members of formal press organizations are eligible for complimentary press credentials. For example, FLEX Magazine presents the NPC, prior to each national event, a list of their assigned photographers and writers committed to cover the particular event. Coverage of the event under those auspices is granted to the NPC.
We do not allow freelance photographers and writers, regardless of their notoriety, press entrance to our events where they shoot photographs or write copy and then submit them to various publications on a prospective sale basis. In other words, maybe they get published and maybe they don't.
In accordance with that philosophy and understanding the growth of the Internet as an information vehicle, the NPC is adopting the same policy modified for the Internet. Beginning immediately at all NPC events, the NPC will recognize only photographers or writers whose credentials are verified by website’s that are extensions of the normal bodybuilding and fitness print publications -- websites that represent FLEX, MUSCLE & FITNESS, IRONMAN, etc. The NPC will no longer recognize websites or individual photographers or writers or interested bodybuilding fans who maintain and promote website's, no matter the level of traffic."
In other words, the NPC is willing to reduce sponsorship value just to protect a set of offline magazines who's readership levels are decreasing because of the Internet. This is even hurting news magazines, like Time and Newsweek, as the link -- and the article reprinted below in case the link dies, will show:
Readers: Newsweeklies'
coming woe
See shakeout with the weakest disappearing
By Gene Ely
Oct 31, 2005 -- Medialife Magazine
Media people have debated for decades the relevance and fate of the newsweeklies, even as they hung on as other mass-market titles stumbled and died. Somehow Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report kept vital against the explosion of competing media.
The question is, how much longer can they remain vital? The answer is, not much.
That's the outcome of a recent Media Life poll of media planners and buyers.
The newsweeklies have been hurt most by the internet, and readers predict that one of the three big U.S. titles will disappear. That would appear to be U.S. News, the longstanding No. 3 title owned by real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman.
U.S. News is the smallest of the three in circulation, the weakest in ad pages, and has the least going for it in terms of strength of brand and quality of editorial, according to the Media Life poll. Recently the magazine has undergone yet another round of budget cuts, leading to more layoffs, as part of a strategy to shift its editorial emphasis online.
Over recent years, certainly since the ad recession that set in in late 2000, the newsweeklies have been confronted by a fundamental change in how ad pages are bought. There was once a time when many advertisers were inclined to buy all three titles. Fewer now do. Rather, they buy one or perhaps two, often pitting all three against one another to get the best deal.
At the same time, and not helping matters any, the internet has had a huge effect on the relevance of the newsweeklies as editorial propositions. That's one of the most profound findings of the Media Life survey.
Readers were asked: "In terms of readership, what is the greatest source of competition for newsweeklies?"
A full 71.4 percent agreed with the statement: "The internet. On-demand news trumps week-old old news any day." After that, a distant No. 2, 17.8 percent credited television, specifically the 24-hour cable news networks.
Just how much has the internet hurt the newsweeklies? Readers were somewhat divided. The largest share, 49.5 percent, agreed with the statement: "A lot. The magazines seem dated the moment they come off the presses, and any scoops they may have are usually leaked early. In fact, the magazines’ own web sites have become their own worst enemy, posting stories before the print version is released."
But almost as many, 40.8 percent, believe that while there's been damage, it has not made the newsweeklies obsolete. They agreed with the statement: "Some but not as much as you’d think. Though you can’t beat the internet for breaking news, the quality of the analysis and features in the newsweeklies keep people reading."
And of course that raises the question of how effective the newsweeklies still are as advertising vehicles. The answer, not surprisingly, is less effective.
Readers were asked: "How valuable are newsweeklies as advertising vehicles now compared with five years ago?"
A fifth agreed that they were still very valuable for reaching a mass audience.
But a far larger share, 62 percent, said that they were less so, agreeing with the statement: "Somewhat valuable. Circulation isn't what it used to be, but they’re still a smart buy when you need mass reach, and you need to do it on short notice."
Almost 18 percent agreed they offered no value to advertisers.
There was far more agreement that a shakeout among the big three titles was coming. Readers were asked: "Is there enough room in the category for three major U.S. newsweeklies?"
More than 70 percent think not, agreeing with this statement: "No. I think there’s a shakeout coming. We’ve already seen some retreat from U.S. News, and I can’t see all three surviving in this advertising environment."
The remainder believe advertising will return and that all three titles will survive after making adjustments to their editorial content.
Of the three magazines, Newsweek comes out as the magazine with the best editorial, just slightly ahead of Time, at 37.9 percent versus 36.8 percent. U.S. News was picked by 25.3 percent of respondents.
When it came to strongest brand, however, the race wasn't even close. Time came out way ahead at 81.3 percent. Newsweek got just 12.1 percent of the votes, while U.S. News earned just 6.6 percent.
And which is the weakest title as a brand, to flip the question around? Answers: U.S. News, 80.6 percent; Newsweek, 15 percent; Time, 8 percent.
Media Life was curious, considering these results, how many media planners and buyers actually read the newsweeklies. The answer is a goodly share. And again, as with quality of editorial, Newsweek edges out Time, here with 51.6 percent versus 49.5 percent. Less than a quarter of respondents say they read U.S. News, at 24.5 percent. (Respondents could choose more than one answer.)
Media Life last asked readers to speculate on whether Zuckerman would sell U.S. News, in light of the recent cutbacks. Readers are divided.
Some 14.5 percent think he will, and soon, the cutbacks being a sure indicator that he is ramping up to sell. But nearly twice as many believe Zuckerman will stick it out. The far largest share, 57 percent, declined to speculate. Over the years, Zuckerman has said consistently that he intends to keep the newsmagazine, and that's in part because it gives him a podium for his ideas and access to politicians and TV news and chat shows.
A little known rule established by the NPC reads:
"As you are aware, the NPC has had a standing press pass policy for all national events that only authorized members of formal press organizations are eligible for complimentary press credentials. For example, FLEX Magazine presents the NPC, prior to each national event, a list of their assigned photographers and writers committed to cover the particular event. Coverage of the event under those auspices is granted to the NPC.
We do not allow freelance photographers and writers, regardless of their notoriety, press entrance to our events where they shoot photographs or write copy and then submit them to various publications on a prospective sale basis. In other words, maybe they get published and maybe they don't.
In accordance with that philosophy and understanding the growth of the Internet as an information vehicle, the NPC is adopting the same policy modified for the Internet. Beginning immediately at all NPC events, the NPC will recognize only photographers or writers whose credentials are verified by website’s that are extensions of the normal bodybuilding and fitness print publications -- websites that represent FLEX, MUSCLE & FITNESS, IRONMAN, etc. The NPC will no longer recognize websites or individual photographers or writers or interested bodybuilding fans who maintain and promote website's, no matter the level of traffic."
In other words, the NPC is willing to reduce sponsorship value just to protect a set of offline magazines who's readership levels are decreasing because of the Internet. This is even hurting news magazines, like Time and Newsweek, as the link -- and the article reprinted below in case the link dies, will show:
Readers: Newsweeklies'
coming woe
See shakeout with the weakest disappearing
By Gene Ely
Oct 31, 2005 -- Medialife Magazine
Media people have debated for decades the relevance and fate of the newsweeklies, even as they hung on as other mass-market titles stumbled and died. Somehow Time, Newsweek and U.S. News & World Report kept vital against the explosion of competing media.
The question is, how much longer can they remain vital? The answer is, not much.
That's the outcome of a recent Media Life poll of media planners and buyers.
The newsweeklies have been hurt most by the internet, and readers predict that one of the three big U.S. titles will disappear. That would appear to be U.S. News, the longstanding No. 3 title owned by real estate mogul Mort Zuckerman.
U.S. News is the smallest of the three in circulation, the weakest in ad pages, and has the least going for it in terms of strength of brand and quality of editorial, according to the Media Life poll. Recently the magazine has undergone yet another round of budget cuts, leading to more layoffs, as part of a strategy to shift its editorial emphasis online.
Over recent years, certainly since the ad recession that set in in late 2000, the newsweeklies have been confronted by a fundamental change in how ad pages are bought. There was once a time when many advertisers were inclined to buy all three titles. Fewer now do. Rather, they buy one or perhaps two, often pitting all three against one another to get the best deal.
At the same time, and not helping matters any, the internet has had a huge effect on the relevance of the newsweeklies as editorial propositions. That's one of the most profound findings of the Media Life survey.
Readers were asked: "In terms of readership, what is the greatest source of competition for newsweeklies?"
A full 71.4 percent agreed with the statement: "The internet. On-demand news trumps week-old old news any day." After that, a distant No. 2, 17.8 percent credited television, specifically the 24-hour cable news networks.
Just how much has the internet hurt the newsweeklies? Readers were somewhat divided. The largest share, 49.5 percent, agreed with the statement: "A lot. The magazines seem dated the moment they come off the presses, and any scoops they may have are usually leaked early. In fact, the magazines’ own web sites have become their own worst enemy, posting stories before the print version is released."
But almost as many, 40.8 percent, believe that while there's been damage, it has not made the newsweeklies obsolete. They agreed with the statement: "Some but not as much as you’d think. Though you can’t beat the internet for breaking news, the quality of the analysis and features in the newsweeklies keep people reading."
And of course that raises the question of how effective the newsweeklies still are as advertising vehicles. The answer, not surprisingly, is less effective.
Readers were asked: "How valuable are newsweeklies as advertising vehicles now compared with five years ago?"
A fifth agreed that they were still very valuable for reaching a mass audience.
But a far larger share, 62 percent, said that they were less so, agreeing with the statement: "Somewhat valuable. Circulation isn't what it used to be, but they’re still a smart buy when you need mass reach, and you need to do it on short notice."
Almost 18 percent agreed they offered no value to advertisers.
There was far more agreement that a shakeout among the big three titles was coming. Readers were asked: "Is there enough room in the category for three major U.S. newsweeklies?"
More than 70 percent think not, agreeing with this statement: "No. I think there’s a shakeout coming. We’ve already seen some retreat from U.S. News, and I can’t see all three surviving in this advertising environment."
The remainder believe advertising will return and that all three titles will survive after making adjustments to their editorial content.
Of the three magazines, Newsweek comes out as the magazine with the best editorial, just slightly ahead of Time, at 37.9 percent versus 36.8 percent. U.S. News was picked by 25.3 percent of respondents.
When it came to strongest brand, however, the race wasn't even close. Time came out way ahead at 81.3 percent. Newsweek got just 12.1 percent of the votes, while U.S. News earned just 6.6 percent.
And which is the weakest title as a brand, to flip the question around? Answers: U.S. News, 80.6 percent; Newsweek, 15 percent; Time, 8 percent.
Media Life was curious, considering these results, how many media planners and buyers actually read the newsweeklies. The answer is a goodly share. And again, as with quality of editorial, Newsweek edges out Time, here with 51.6 percent versus 49.5 percent. Less than a quarter of respondents say they read U.S. News, at 24.5 percent. (Respondents could choose more than one answer.)
Media Life last asked readers to speculate on whether Zuckerman would sell U.S. News, in light of the recent cutbacks. Readers are divided.
Some 14.5 percent think he will, and soon, the cutbacks being a sure indicator that he is ramping up to sell. But nearly twice as many believe Zuckerman will stick it out. The far largest share, 57 percent, declined to speculate. Over the years, Zuckerman has said consistently that he intends to keep the newsmagazine, and that's in part because it gives him a podium for his ideas and access to politicians and TV news and chat shows.
Friday, May 19, 2006
Alisa Rips A Phonebook With Her Bare Hands - Video
I think this goes under the "in case you've never seen a woman do this" category. Alisa's a woman in Dallas, Texas -- last name unknown as of this writing -- who's been using the Internet to demonstrate feats of strength. In this case, she's tearing a phone book apart. In other videos, she's crushed a pear and and queezed an orange with one hand.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Contra Costa Championships Winners List
Here's the list of winners from last weekend's Contra Costa Championships in Hayward. (Which makes no sense to to me because Contra Costa is a county next to Hayward, which in turn is in Alameda, County. Oh well.)
LW:
1) Claire Rohrbacker-O'Connell
2) Tammy Jin
3) Cathy Sabetto
4) Amanda Kelly
MW:
1) Joella Bernard
2) Danielle Guevara
3) Connie Holt
4) Deanza Murphy
HW:
1) Giulia Devana
LW:
1) Claire Rohrbacker-O'Connell
2) Tammy Jin
3) Cathy Sabetto
4) Amanda Kelly
MW:
1) Joella Bernard
2) Danielle Guevara
3) Connie Holt
4) Deanza Murphy
HW:
1) Giulia Devana
Guilia Colbacchini - Giulia Devena -- won the heavyweight class in the NPC Contra Costa Bodybuilding, Figure & Fitness Championships, May 13th in Hayward, CA. Her website is at http://www.giuliadivina.com
Here's Guilia!
Here's Guilia!
Thursday, May 11, 2006
Jody May's Been Busy - Blog Report
Texas Champion Bodybuilder -- and the best candidate to play Wonder Woman in the upcoming movie -- Jody May has come out of hiding to give her fans an update:
"Hi all!!! Man it has been a while, but in my defence, my blog has not been working and Andy got it all fixed for me. What have I been up to??!! WOW that is too much for me to write, I am slow ya know !lol.
This weekend I am going to Shreveport to guest pose with Sheliah Brown and her group Syncronicity. She did this kick ass routine!! Check out the website www.UltimateBodybuilding.net for more info. It is really going to be great!! Superman has done an awesome job marketing this first year show. All the radio stations, live TV and a huge fitness day for kids. Really looking forward to it.
Then June 3rd I will be in Plano at the Lone Star. I have 2 friends competing and I will also be unveilling a surprise that weekend!!!! Very cool so keep ya eyes peeled.
I also started my prep for USA's July 29th in Vegas. I will be adding photos more often of that progress in addition to regular updates. I started dieting at 13.7% bodfat and 191 pounds!! And that was actually down from 201. I skerred myself!
lol I have already upped my cardio because I am afraid I won't be ready. But I will, I am sooo pumped for this show, and then I am staying in Vegas with my husband and lots of friends for a mini vacation. I have not had one in forever!!"
...(The surprise is that she got a breast enlargement!)
Visit her site at www.jody-may.com
Tazzie Columb's -- IFBB Professional Bodybuilder -- Shows Her Power Lifting 130 LBS With One Arm, Several Times
If anyone needs a demonstration that female bodybuilders work as hard as the men -- and for less sponsorship money -- here's proof. IFBB Professional Bodybuilder Tazzie Columb is in this video lifting 130 pounds several times in one arm as part of her routine. This level of power places her in a category that rivals -- if not surpasses -- some NFL players.
Here's the video:
Here's the video:
Tuesday, May 09, 2006
Introducting Guilia Colbacchini...With a New Website!
Guilia Colbacchini is a bodybuilder and personal trainer at Gold's Gym in Oakland, CA. She will be competing in the NPC Contra Costa Bodybuilding, Figure & Fitness Championships, May 13th in Hayward, CA. Her website is at http://www.giuliadivina.com
Here's Guilia!
Here's Guilia!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)